High Extinction Ratio and Laser Damage Threshold (See Table Below)
Two Polarizer Sizes: Ø12.5 mm and Ø25.0 mm
Mounted and Unmounted Versions
Mounted Versions with SM05 or SM1 External Threadings
Resistant to UV Radiation and Chemicals
These Nanoparticle Linear Film Polarizers are comprised from spherical ellipsoid nanoparticles that have been embedded in sodium-silicate glass, thereby generating a polarizing effect. They offer superior performance compared to conventional, polymer-based polarizers. While both conventional and nanoparticle polarizers absorb the light that is polarized perpendicular to the transmission axis, the nanoparticles have a significantly higher damage threshold and a dramatically better extinction ratio.
With the exception of the LPNIRA and the LPMIR series, the sodium-silicate glass is sandwiched between index-matched glass substrates, and a line is marked on the edge of the polarizer to indicate the polarization axis. The LPNIR and LPMIR series are only a polarizer; there is no substrate.
Extinction Ratios and Laser Damage Thresholds
Series
LPUV
LPVIS
LPVIS A
LPVIS B
LPNIR
LPNIR A
LPMIR
Wavelength Range
365 - 395 nm
550 - 1500 nm
480 - 550 nm
500 - 720 nm
650 - 2000 nm
1000 - 3000 nm
1500 - 5000 nm
Extinction Ratios:*
> 100 000 : 1
372 - 388 nm
600 - 1200 nm
-
-
850 - 1600 nm
-
-
> 10 000 : 1
369 - 390 nm
550 - 1500 nm
480 - 550 nm
500 - 720 nm
750 - 1800 nm
1200 - 3000 nm
2000 - 4500 nm
> 1 000 : 1
365 - 395 nm
-
-
-
650 - 2000 nm
1000 - 3000 nm
1500 - 5000 nm
Laser Damage Threshold
1 W/cm² Continuous Block
10 W/cm² Continuous Block
5 W/cm² Continuous Pass
25 W/cm² Continuous Pass
*The LP Polarizer Series maintains an Extinction Ratio of at least 1000:1 over the full operating bandwidth. Extinction Ratios of 10,000:1 (Min) or 100,000:1 are maintained over specific wavelength ranges (see the Graphs tab for details).
Series
LPUV
LPVIS
LPVISA
LPVISB
LPNIR
LPNIRA
LPMIR
Wavelength Range
365 - 395 nm
550 - 1500 nm
480 - 550 nm
500 - 720 nm
650 - 2000 nm
1000 - 3000 nm
1500 - 5000 nm
Extinction Ratios:**
> 100,000 : 1
372 - 388 nm
600 - 1200 nm
-
-
850 - 1600 nm
-
-
> 10,000 : 1
369 - 390 nm
550 - 1500 nm
480 - 550 nm
500 - 720 nm
750 - 1800 nm
1200 - 3000 nm
2000 - 4500 nm
> 1000 : 1
365 - 395 nm
-
-
-
650 - 2000 nm
1000 - 3000 nm
1500 - 5000 nm
Polarizing Material
Nanoparticles in Sodium-Silicate Glass
Substrate Material
Schott Glass B270
None
Diameter (Tolerance)
Unmounted Version: 12.5 (LPxxx050) or 25.0 mm ±0.2 mm (LPxxx100); Mounted Version: 17.8 mm (LPxxx050) or 30.5 mm (LPxxx100)
Clear Aperture
Unmounted Version: 90% of Surface Dimension; Mounted Version: 75% (LPxxx050) or 82% (LPxxx100) of Surface Dimension
Thickness
Unmounted Version: 2.0 ±0.2 mm; Mounted Version: 10.4 mm (LPxxx050) or 11.4 mm (LPxxx100) incl. LPMIR Series
Unmounted Version: 220 ±50 µm
Wavefront Distortion
<λ/4 @ 633 nm
<3λ @ 633 nm
Surface Quality
Surface Imperfections: 5/2 x 0.04 within 1 cm² acc. (ISO 10110-07)
Acceptance Angle*
±20°
Laser DamageThreshold
1 W/cm² Continuous Block
10 W/cm² Continuous Block
5 W/cm² Continuous Pass
25 W/cm² Continuous Pass
Operating Temperature
-20 to +120 °C
-50 to +400 °C
Maintenance
Clean with Standard Cleaning Solvents
*The acceptance angle is limited by losses due to Fresnel reflections. **The LP Polarizer Series maintains an Extinction Ratio of at least 1000:1 over the full operating bandwidth. Extinction Ratios of 10,000:1 (Min) or 100,000:1 are maintained over specific wavelength ranges (see the Graphs tab for details).
The plots below show the transmission as a function of wavelength (green lines) and the extinction ratio (ER) as a function of wavelength (blue lines) for each linear polarizer when the light is normally incident. The percent transmission is the percentage of light with a linear state-of-polarization (SOP) aligned with the transmission axis that is transmitted through the linear polarizer. This number is less than 100% because of surface reflections and internal absorption. The ER is the ratio of the transmitted intensity of a linearly polarized beam of light with the orientation of the SOP parallel to the transmission axis to the transmitted intensity of the same linearly polarized beam of light with the orientation of the SOP perpendicular to the transmission axis. For reference, an ER of 1x106 is typical of a top-of-the-line Glan-Laser Calcite Polarizer, although a calcite polarizer has a significantly higher damage threshold.
A response from Julien at Thorlabs: Thank you for your interest in our products! The transmission of the polarizers is wavelength dependent and can be seen under the tab "Graphs" of their product page. Concerning the waveplates, we specify a reflectance of less than 0.5% per surface (0.25% for the multi-order waveplates) and the absorption is that of fused silica so that a transmission >97% should normally be achieved.
Poster: 77071191
Posted Date: 2012-12-24 01:44:58.023
I want to know the transimission of the plorizer LPVIS050 and 1/4 waveplate,could you help me ?
Poster: bdada
Posted Date: 2012-06-05 19:34:00.0
Response from Buki at Thorlabs to ariyad2:
Thank you for your feedback. We are reviewing your request and will contact you with more information shortly.
Poster: hariyad2
Posted Date: 2012-05-31 05:45:26.0
Do you have Calibrated Linear Polarizer (at 0 and 45 deg oriented) to sell ? If yes, how does the price ?
Thanks
Hary, Finland
Poster: bdada
Posted Date: 2012-02-08 20:26:00.0
Response from Buki at Thorlabs:
The acceptance angle of the polarizer is +/- 20 degrees, due to losses from Fresnel reflections. This information is included in the "Specs" tab on the web page.
Please contact TechSupport@thorlabs.com if you have any questions.
Poster:
Posted Date: 2012-01-31 01:43:46.0
Is the polarizer dependent on AOI?
Poster: bdada
Posted Date: 2011-07-26 20:48:00.0
Response from Buki at Thorlabs:
We don’t have the test data for your specific laser pulse width. The damage threshold for the LPNIR050 is 3 mJ/cm^2 at 1064 nm with 6 ns pulse width. Please contact TechSupport@thorlabs.com if you have additional questions or to discuss the specifications of your laser so we can determine if the LPNIR polarizer is suitable for your application.
Poster: Mikhail.Levin
Posted Date: 2011-07-26 14:49:02.0
Please inform about the Laser damage Threshold for LPNIR polarizer in the case of 1064 short pulse laser (pulse ~1 psec)
Poster: jvigroux
Posted Date: 2011-06-03 10:21:00.0
A response from Julien at Thorlabs: The difference between the specification and the graph arises from the fact that the specified ER concerns the whole wavelength range and is thus a lower limit. The graph data on the other hand corresponds to a typical data and is therefore not to be considered as an absolute specification. I will contact you directly in order to see which solution would be the most adapted for your application.
Poster: federica.beduini
Posted Date: 2011-06-02 12:20:58.0
In the graph section one can see that the LPVIS series can reach an extinction ratio of 10^8 for 800 nm, but in the specs you guarantee only >10^5 extinction ratio.
Is it possible to order custom product which satisfies the 10^8 specification? I will work with a wavelength of 795 nm. Thanks!
Poster: tor
Posted Date: 2010-12-09 10:04:18.0
Response from Tor at Thorlabs to Dimitri: Thank you for your interest in our Nanoparticle Linear Film Polarizers. While these are not AR-coated, we may be able to offer AR-coated versions as a custom. I will contact you shortly to discuss your exact needs.
Poster: Dimitri.Mawet
Posted Date: 2010-12-08 16:45:07.0
Are there AR coatings on any of these polarizers, and if not, could you apply one ? If there is one, Id be interested in seeing the reflectance curves. Thanks.
Poster: mburda
Posted Date: 2010-11-30 21:44:02.0
Hello, I have some questions about your LPMIR Polarizers.
Are you able to make these at custom sizes? We would only be ordering a few at a time for design phase, but potentially hundreds-thousands when in production.
For the MIR version, with a LDT of 10W/cm^2 block, is there a high power option? I ask because I saw in your discussion that there is a version with no adhesive.
This would be very helpful to get a response to these questions very soon. We are in the process of designing and doing a lot of quoting which this would be very important for us.
Could you give me a rough quote on quantities 5, 20, 50,100, 500 of the LPMIR, but with a 5mm diameter?
For now I am going to place an order for a few pieces for design testing.
Thank you for your time, I hope to hear from you as soon as possible.
Mike
Poster: julien
Posted Date: 2010-11-30 16:26:36.0
A response from Julien At Thorlabs: Dear Mike, we can offer custom sizes for the polarizers, both for small and large quantities. the LDT cannot be increased as the LPMIR is not laminated, in contrary to the other polarizers (hence the already higher damage threshold). However this value is valid only for CW lasers and will strongly vary when a pulsed laser source is used. I will contact you directly to further discuss your application and the possible use of our polarizers.
Poster: tor
Posted Date: 2010-11-10 11:28:05.0
Response from Tor at Thorlabs to luis.dussan: Thank you for your interest in our products. We are working on testing damage thresholds for many of our optics. We currently have a fluence damage threshold of 3 mJ/cm^2, 6 ns, 1064 nm given for the LPNIR050. I will contact you to obtain more information on your application to determine whether these polarizers are suitable for you.
Poster: luis.dussan
Posted Date: 2010-11-08 21:29:50.0
re Nanoparticle Linear Film Polarizers
what is the Fluence DT for 1550nm 10ns 20Hz 100-400um diameter beam.
Thanks
Poster: Thorlabs
Posted Date: 2010-10-20 12:00:23.0
Response from Javier at Thorlabs to Baohua.Niu: the refractive index is determined not only by the glass substrate, but by the particles used, as well. The values are as follows:
At 1064 nm: 1.5120
At 1340 nm: 1.5900
Poster: Baohua.Niu
Posted Date: 2010-10-20 01:12:21.0
Can some one from the technical support department tell me whats the refraction index of the LPNIR100 polarizer at 1064nm and 1340nm wavelength? Is it just the refraction index of the glass substrate or something else?
Thanks,
Baohua.Niu@intel.com
Poster: julien
Posted Date: 2010-10-05 12:54:20.0
a Response from Julien at Thorlabs: The thin film polarizer is sandwiched between two glass plates that are glued together. The glue itself is not UHV compatible. We can also offer unlaminated polarizers that do not use any glue. As a result, there should be no outgasing problem for UHV applications. I will contact you directly to further discuss your application and see which type of polarizer would be best for your application.
Poster: badgie
Posted Date: 2010-10-04 16:23:40.0
Can you comment on the UHV compatibility of the unmounted polarizers? Thanks
Poster: Thorlabs
Posted Date: 2010-08-25 11:16:42.0
Response from Javier at Thorlabs to lawrence.berg: Thank you for your feedback. The correct specifications for damage threshold of these linear polarizers are those on the web (1 W/cm^2 block, 5 W/cm^2 pass). This is on our catalog corrections list and we will update the catalog pdf on the web.
Poster: lawrence.berg
Posted Date: 2010-08-25 09:18:52.0
Damage threshold on the LPNIR series. Web page states 1w/cm2 block, 5w/cm2 pass. The catalog page states 10W/cm2 block, 25W/cm2 pass. Which is it? The difference is crucial to to me. Thanks.
Poster: Thorlabs
Posted Date: 2010-07-21 08:38:02.0
Response from Javier at Thorlabs to lunxus.inc: Thank you for your feedback. The current lead time for the LPVIS050-MP is one week.
Poster: lynxus.inc
Posted Date: 2010-07-20 15:43:17.0
Please inform asap the Lead Time for this product.
Thanks
Abrao zatz
LynxUS Inc.
Poster: klee
Posted Date: 2009-11-12 11:08:24.0
A response from Ken at Thorlabs to physics_nt: These conditions can be critical. We would thus recommend going with a special non-laminated version because it does not contain glue. If you would like to get a quotation for this, please send your full contact information to techsupport@thorlabs.com and also confirm the size that you need.
Poster: physics_nt
Posted Date: 2009-11-10 13:44:15.0
In response to Ken: 800nm peak, 10 nm bandwidth, ~6-8 mm diameter, 500 uJ pulse energy, 200 fs, 1 kHz. Typically, the polarizer would see about 100 uJ.
Poster: klee
Posted Date: 2009-11-10 10:27:59.0
A response from Ken at Thorlabs to physics_nt:
A good guideline is 1MW/cm² pulse peak power.
We will be happy to check if the polarizer is suitable for your laser if you can provide wavelength, beam diameter, peak power, pulse length, and repetition rate.
Poster: physics_nt
Posted Date: 2009-11-06 16:15:24.0
Is there any information available about pulsed laser damage threshold?
Poster: klee
Posted Date: 2009-09-04 11:36:04.0
A response from Ken at Thorlabs to bdeng: The transmittance should not have any unit. Thank you for pointing out the error. We will correct it ASAP.
Poster: bdeng
Posted Date: 2009-09-03 16:27:01.0
Why is the very important parameter, transmittance, has a unit of A/W in the plots?
Poster: apalmentieri
Posted Date: 2009-08-06 16:56:19.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs: The best blocking you can achieve with these polarizers when using 532nm light is .01% transmission. This can be achieved using the LPVISA polarizers. When we quote an ER of 1:100,000 at 330nm, that means that when polarizers are crossed each polarization will transmit with a transmission of .001%.
Poster: ogersmith
Posted Date: 2009-08-05 12:51:20.0
I am interested in achieving high blocking
from crossed polarizers at 532 nm. What
can be achieved in Tr Vs Ext at this wavelength?
and when quote an ER of 100,000 at 330nm
say, what would that imply for a cross
polarizer setup?
Thank you,
Roger Smith
Poster: apalmentieri
Posted Date: 2009-06-15 11:00:28.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs: The working angle for this polarizer is normal incidence. The light transmitted from this polarizer, would be linear polarized light. If you have further questions, please let us know.
Poster: hongchang.wang
Posted Date: 2009-06-14 21:55:01.0
I ordered one linear polariser LPVISB050 last week. I want to know whether the working angle is normal to the light? If not, whats the brewster angle of the polariser? By the way, whether we use the transmission mode to get the polaised light?
Thanks for your kind reply.
Poster:
Posted Date: 2008-06-17 09:48:38.0
Jorg-uwe,
In regards to your request, we do not offer too much along the lines of polarizing beam splitter cubes. Currently, we only offer a 3mm polarizing beamsplitter cube that works for 1525-1610nm:
http://www.thorlabs.com/NewGroupPage9.cfm?ObjectGroup_ID=739&pn=PBS3&CFID=17605037&CFTOKEN=33382678
In the future we plan to offer larger versions a polarizing beam splitter cubes that work for various wavelength ranges. I noticed that you are looking for a large cube(~4”) that works for 2-2.4um, but you also need it to work for .500um(~20%). What size do you need? What type of AOI are you looking for? How many do you need? I think the current sizes that we are considering are 1-2” cubes. The AOI for the cubes would be normal incidence. As I state previously, our larger polarizing beamsplitter cubes have not yet been released. Please let me know what you need. After I get this information, I will check with our optics division to determine if there is anything we can provide.
Poster: jpott
Posted Date: 2008-05-28 01:46:36.0
>Dear Sir, or Madam,
>
> we have a need for polarizing beam splitters,
> working at 2-2.4microns. I am about to design a specific requirement
> document, but at the beginning I would like to understand what is
> possible in general terms.
>
>Please reply to this request if your company has experience in the
>following area of specifications:
>The beamsplitter should be broad-band transmitting one linear
>polarization direction, and reflecting the orthogonal direction.
>What T/R values are possible (ROM), if optimized for 2.0-2.4micron, and
>high polarization accuracy / extinction ratios (e.g. 0.1%) There is no need for longer
>wavelengths, but shorter wavelengths down to 0.5um should be
>transmitted a decent fraction (> 20%).
>Are there size limits for these optics, is a 4in diameter conceivable? AOI can be matched to the solution (cube? plate?), T/R wavefront error should be
>Looking forward to your input
>
> jorg-uwe pott
Click on any phrase below to search our site using our new Search Engine: